Our Research Methodology: Accuracy in Patient Advocacy
At Aging Health, we believe that health literacy is the foundation of effective care. Because our content reaches seniors and caregivers managing complex conditions, we adhere to a rigorous, multi-step verification process to ensure every article meets the highest standards of accuracy and reliability.
1. Primary Source Prioritization
We do not rely on secondary news reports or "viral" health trends. Our research begins with primary authorities:
Clinical Guidelines: We monitor the latest practice updates from the AASLD (Liver Disease), ACC/AHA (Cardiology), and ADA (Diabetes).
Government Databases: We utilize the NIH (National Institutes of Health) and CDC for epidemiological data and baseline health facts.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Key insights are cross-referenced with studies found via PubMed and The Lancet.
2. The "Precision Machining" Standard
Drawing on Tommy T. Douglas’s professional background in precision engineering, we apply a "zero-tolerance" approach to medical data. This means:
Verification: Data points are cross verified across at least two independent, reputable medical sources.
Contextualization: We don't just report a "cure"; we explain the MELD score, the portal pressure mechanics, or the cardiovascular impact behind the headline.
Expertise via Experience: Clinical facts are paired with first-hand patient insights to explain how a diagnosis feels and functions in daily life.
3. Transparency and Citations
Every article includes a "Professional Sources" block. We provide direct outbound links to the specific medical papers or guidelines discussed, allowing readers and healthcare providers to verify the data themselves.
4. Continuous Revision Policy
Medical science is evolving. We regularly audit our "Research Archive" to ensure older posts reflect the most current 2024–2026 clinical standards. We welcome reader feedback and professional corrections to maintain the integrity of our library.